<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reputation Management &#8211; 2009 Finalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.semmys.org/2009/reputation-management-2009-finalists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.semmys.org/2009/reputation-management-2009-finalists/</link>
	<description>The Search Engine Marketing Awards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 15:50:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Tamminga</title>
		<link>http://www.semmys.org/2009/reputation-management-2009-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-434</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tamminga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semmys.org/?p=107#comment-434</guid>
		<description>Excellent articles.  All three showed examples of how difficult it can be to keep your reputation in tact and how problems in business can be illuminated by anyone willing to post an opinion.  Tough choice.  Matt&#039;s was a bit long, could have been a trilogy instead of one long article.  However, all of the content was solid - no fluff.  Andy, nice job laying out a solution.  Brett, excellent analysis of the levels of difficulty that a company might face when restoring their reputation.  

I&#039;ll vote now.  Thanks for your hard work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent articles.  All three showed examples of how difficult it can be to keep your reputation in tact and how problems in business can be illuminated by anyone willing to post an opinion.  Tough choice.  Matt&#8217;s was a bit long, could have been a trilogy instead of one long article.  However, all of the content was solid &#8211; no fluff.  Andy, nice job laying out a solution.  Brett, excellent analysis of the levels of difficulty that a company might face when restoring their reputation.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll vote now.  Thanks for your hard work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Borders</title>
		<link>http://www.semmys.org/2009/reputation-management-2009-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Borders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semmys.org/?p=107#comment-432</guid>
		<description>I appreciate being selected as a finalist... I did a lot of research and in-the-trenches online reputation management work in 2008 and it&#039;s an honor to be recognized!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate being selected as a finalist&#8230; I did a lot of research and in-the-trenches online reputation management work in 2008 and it&#8217;s an honor to be recognized!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beal</title>
		<link>http://www.semmys.org/2009/reputation-management-2009-finalists/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.semmys.org/?p=107#comment-431</guid>
		<description>All three are great articles. Thanks to the judges for the honor of being selected as a finalist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All three are great articles. Thanks to the judges for the honor of being selected as a finalist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
